Iron 57

Iron sphere stacking with green protons and white neutrons.
The nucleus causes ferromagnetism.
Figure 1: One of six pyramids and cube

The cube has 27 baryons.
Each pyramid has 5 baryons.
There are six pyramids for the six faces of the cube. Cubic hexapyramid.

Iron is magnetic because...

Executive Summary
Iron is ferromagnetic because the nucleus has two coaxial rings of protons. Each ring has 12 protons. A current flows in each ring of protons. It is like an electromagnet with a superconducting current. January 2, 2023 
Read my book on Amazon for $99.


The nucleus of iron has a sphere stacking shape with
two loops of 12 protons. The loops are coaxial with
the other 2 protons of element 26. Protons in a loop
become oriented together so a dimension current Ex
flows in a loop. Orthogonal to that flow, a bundled
Ht dimension flows coaxially into the nucleus from
24 electrons. If both loops of protons carry Ex in
the same direction, a domain can be made in a crystal.
If one loop carries Ex in the opposite direction,
no domain can be made. Magnetic torque is anchored

by the two loop shape of the iron nucleus.

Summary
In the iron nucleus, the loop currents i1 and i2 can
flow in the opposite directions, especially above
the Curie Temperature. The two loops act as a
"superconducting transformer transistor" where the
directions of the i1 and i2 are influenced by the 24
electrons and the magnitudes are set by the gravity
eight dimensional theory. The Ht dimension that is
bundled for 24 protons is called magnetyme. The
electron sources Ht and the proton sinks Ht, as a
mirror image to a star which sources time, which

grows radially outward to places at infinity,
which sink time. See linked details of 8D from 2016:


Non-ferrous elements also have loops, but they
are defective, compared to iron. Copper has three
more protons than iron
so they short circuit one loop
to a coaxial proton. For example Zirconium only lacks
the coaxial perfection of iron, as seen in the


Periodic Table of Elements: Shapes of Nuclei.
August 9, 2017


The glass bead model was not designed by me, I discovered it. When I put the pyramids on the cube, I had few choices about which way to rotate it. I chose to line up a line of protons with an adjacent line. If I had rotated the pyramid ninety degrees, the loop could be avoided. No other choice is available in stacking spheres, starting with Figure 1's pyramid and cube. After the model was assembled, I observed that two loops existed for the positions of the protons. It was discovered, not invented or planned. acf 8/9/2017


Figure 2: Iron nucleus, green protons in loop, coaxial proton

The unified gravito-Maxwellian Equations give a way for this Iron geometric model to have a numeric magnitude of Magnetic Field Intensity H,

Figure 3: Unified Gravito-Maxwellian Equations

r = proton radius .95fm
tau = 5.13ns
tau_e = 3.8*10^-29 seconds

See http://traction8d.blogspot.com/p/neo-maxwell-data.html

n is number of protons per cubic meter making E field
M is number of paired protons to free electrons
N is number of baryons causing gravity g


Solving for H Magnetic Field Intensity

H = 1.4724 * 10^(-4) amps per meter

v1 is a normalized velocity of 1 meter per second

v is a velocity relative to the proton

v = T/p = energy over momentum

T= 938 MeV proton energy

p = (V/tau)(k/G) for 8D momentricity

V is proton volume, G is Newton's constant, k is Coulomb Constant. 

M = 24 protons in two loops in Iron 57 nucleus

v = c/187

Calculate B Magnetic Flux Density

B = mu H = magnetic flux density from an Iron nucleus

B = 1.8502 * 10^(-10) Weber per Fe nucleus square meter

Since 24 protons are in Fe loops, the Weber is defined:

1 Weber = 129 Billion lines of flux.

One line of flux is a line from one proton to one free, remote electron
Figure 4: gravity and electric dependence on r, proton radius



Figure 5: green protons, white neutrons in a Loop


July 8, 2017 Alan Folmsbee

go to top menu

Comments

  1. 110% rubbish. You have no evidence, no scientific rigor. You post on a crackpot blog. Seriously. you spent all this time "discovering" all this useless nonsense. Why not go be a productive member of society?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you for putting a time stamp on this discovery website.

    ReplyDelete
  3. There is always someone, who is challenged by something out of what they deem to be ordinary. That seems to put so much stress on some people that they start yelling :-)
    Sure, I'd also like to have this concept tested and "proven", but I definitely appreciate that you published it . Who knows what inspiration can be drawn from it by someone more open and qualified
    than the time-stamper...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The proof is in two categories: past proof and future proof. Iron was chosen to be the first element to be evaluated with The Static Nucleus Theory of the Face-Armored Cubic Lattice. Other scientists started with hydrogen first, and tried to evaluate heavier elements based on understanding hydrogen. That was a bad choice. Iron was the best choice to begin this research on nuclear structure. Ferromagnetism is proven to be amazing, almost magic. The nucleus of iron has an amazing shape.

      Delete

Post a Comment